Clawhost (Dev) vs ShipClaw
Side-by-side comparison of two OpenClaw hosting providers. All data verified as of February 2026.
| Clawhost (Dev) | ShipClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Live | Live |
| Entry Price | $25/mo | $49/mo |
| Top Tier | $25/mo | $200/mo |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Security | Basic 2.8/100 | Basic 11.6/100 |
| Security Details | Clawhost (Dev) is an early-stage Beta product with polished marketing but extremely thin security posture. | ShipClaw is an early-stage OpenClaw hosting provider focused on ease of deployment ('30 seconds, no Docker'). |
| Integrations | 5 platforms | 1 platforms |
| Infrastructure | Managed cloud (provider not specified) | Managed cloud (6 regions) |
Key Differences
- $Clawhost (Dev) is cheaper to start ($25/mo vs $49/mo).
- SShipClaw has stronger security (Basic 11.6/100 vs Basic 2.8/100).
- IClawhost (Dev) has more integrations (5 vs 1).
Security Breakdown
10 risk categories, 1-10 maturity × evidence weight, grounded in OWASP Agentic Security
| Risk | Clawhost (Dev) | ShipClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Can anyone else see my data? | 2/10 [C] | 3/10 [C] |
| Can someone take over my agent? | 1/10 [U] | 1/10 [C] |
| Are my keys and passwords safe? | 2/10 [C] | 3/10 [D] |
| Can my agent do things I didn't authorize? | 1/10 [U] | 1/10 [U] |
| Can I lose my data or get locked out? | 1/10 [C] | 2/10 [C] |
| Will I get unexpected bills? | 3/10 [C] | 4/10 [D] |
| Who's responsible when something goes wrong? | 1/10 [C] | 2/10 [C] |
| What if a tool or dependency gets compromised? | 1/10 [U] | 2/10 [D] |
| Is the platform itself secure? | 2/10 [C] | 3/10 [D] |
| Can I trust what my agent tells me? | 1/10 [U] | 0/10 [U] |
| Effective Total | 2.8/100 | 11.6/100 |
Clawhost (Dev) Integrations
WhatsAppTelegramSlackGitHubJira
ShipClaw Integrations
Telegram
Clawhost (Dev) Strengths
- +Claims 10K+ agents deployed
- +Simple single-price model
- +Non-technical setup (no terminal needed)
- +Live demo on homepage
ShipClaw Strengths
- +AI credits included (removes BYOK friction)
- +Fastest claimed deploy time (30s)
- +Browser automation built-in
- +Multiple global regions
Clawhost (Dev) Weaknesses
- −Confusing branding (multiple 'Clawhost' providers exist)
- −10K+ claim unverifiable
ShipClaw Weaknesses
- −Telegram-only integration currently
- −Solo developer project
- −2GB RAM on starter plan insufficient for browser use
- −Generic security claims
Clawhost (Dev) Verdict
Managed SaaS option with non-technical setup. The 10K+ agents claim needs verification.
ShipClaw Verdict
Best if you want AI credits included and don't want to bring your own API keys. Limited to Telegram for now.