EasyClaw vs ShipClaw
Side-by-side comparison of two OpenClaw hosting providers. All data verified as of February 2026.
| EasyClaw | ShipClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Live | Live |
| Entry Price | $49/mo | $49/mo |
| Top Tier | $49/mo | $200/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Security | Basic 7.5/100 | Basic 11.6/100 |
| Security Details | EasyClaw is an early-stage MVP built by a solo founder (Hector Guedea, based in Colima, Mexico) offering managed OpenClaw hosting exclusively via Telegram. | ShipClaw is an early-stage OpenClaw hosting provider focused on ease of deployment ('30 seconds, no Docker'). |
| Integrations | 1 platforms | 1 platforms |
| Infrastructure | Managed cloud (unspecified) | Managed cloud (6 regions) |
Key Differences
- $Both start at $49/mo.
- FEasyClaw offers a free tier; ShipClaw does not.
- SShipClaw has stronger security (Basic 11.6/100 vs Basic 7.5/100).
- IBoth support Telegram.
Security Breakdown
10 risk categories, 1-10 maturity × evidence weight, grounded in OWASP Agentic Security
| Risk | EasyClaw | ShipClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Can anyone else see my data? | 3/10 [C] | 3/10 [C] |
| Can someone take over my agent? | 2/10 [C] | 1/10 [C] |
| Are my keys and passwords safe? | 4/10 [C] | 3/10 [D] |
| Can my agent do things I didn't authorize? | 2/10 [U] | 1/10 [U] |
| Can I lose my data or get locked out? | 1/10 [U] | 2/10 [C] |
| Will I get unexpected bills? | 5/10 [D] | 4/10 [D] |
| Who's responsible when something goes wrong? | 2/10 [C] | 2/10 [C] |
| What if a tool or dependency gets compromised? | 2/10 [U] | 2/10 [D] |
| Is the platform itself secure? | 3/10 [C] | 3/10 [D] |
| Can I trust what my agent tells me? | 1/10 [U] | 0/10 [U] |
| Effective Total | 7.5/100 | 11.6/100 |
EasyClaw Integrations
Telegram
ShipClaw Integrations
Telegram
EasyClaw Strengths
- +No API key friction — AI included
- +Featured on Startup Fame, Indie Hackers, PeerPush
- +Simple single-plan pricing ($49/mo early access)
ShipClaw Strengths
- +AI credits included (removes BYOK friction)
- +Fastest claimed deploy time (30s)
- +Browser automation built-in
- +Multiple global regions
EasyClaw Weaknesses
- −Telegram-only integration
- −New entrant, limited track record
ShipClaw Weaknesses
- −Telegram-only integration currently
- −Solo developer project
- −2GB RAM on starter plan insufficient for browser use
- −Generic security claims
EasyClaw Verdict
Removes the biggest friction point (API keys) by including AI usage. Featured on Startup Fame and Indie Hackers. Telegram-only for now.
ShipClaw Verdict
Best if you want AI credits included and don't want to bring your own API keys. Limited to Telegram for now.