ShipClaw vs SimpleClaw
Side-by-side comparison of two OpenClaw hosting providers. All data verified as of February 2026.
| ShipClaw | SimpleClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Live | Live |
| Entry Price | $49/mo | Free |
| Top Tier | $200/mo | $20/mo |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Security | Basic 11.6/100 | Basic 0/100 |
| Security Details | ShipClaw is an early-stage OpenClaw hosting provider focused on ease of deployment ('30 seconds, no Docker'). | SimpleClaw is a minimal single-page site by solo developer Savio Martin (18, Kerala, India), self-described 'weekend side project.' Zero supplementary pages — no privacy, terms, security, pricing, docs, about — all 404. |
| Integrations | 1 platforms | 1 platforms |
| Infrastructure | Managed cloud (6 regions) | Managed cloud (unspecified) |
Key Differences
- $SimpleClaw is cheaper to start (Free vs $49/mo).
- FSimpleClaw offers a free tier; ShipClaw does not.
- SShipClaw has stronger security (Basic 11.6/100 vs Not Rated).
- IBoth support Telegram.
Security Breakdown
10 risk categories, 1-10 maturity × evidence weight, grounded in OWASP Agentic Security
| Risk | ShipClaw | SimpleClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Can anyone else see my data? | 3/10 [C] | 0/10 [U] |
| Can someone take over my agent? | 1/10 [C] | 0/10 [U] |
| Are my keys and passwords safe? | 3/10 [D] | 0/10 [U] |
| Can my agent do things I didn't authorize? | 1/10 [U] | 0/10 [U] |
| Can I lose my data or get locked out? | 2/10 [C] | 0/10 [U] |
| Will I get unexpected bills? | 4/10 [D] | 1/10 [U] |
| Who's responsible when something goes wrong? | 2/10 [C] | 0/10 [U] |
| What if a tool or dependency gets compromised? | 2/10 [D] | 0/10 [U] |
| Is the platform itself secure? | 3/10 [D] | 1/10 [U] |
| Can I trust what my agent tells me? | 0/10 [U] | 0/10 [U] |
| Effective Total | 11.6/100 | Not Rated |
ShipClaw Integrations
Telegram
SimpleClaw Integrations
Telegram
ShipClaw Strengths
- +AI credits included (removes BYOK friction)
- +Fastest claimed deploy time (30s)
- +Browser automation built-in
- +Multiple global regions
SimpleClaw Strengths
- +Free tier available (limited spots)
- +Google sign-in for easy onboarding
- +Solo founder (Savio Martin) — responsive support
- +Multi-model support (Claude, GPT, Gemini)
ShipClaw Weaknesses
- −Telegram-only integration currently
- −Solo developer project
- −2GB RAM on starter plan insufficient for browser use
- −Generic security claims
SimpleClaw Weaknesses
- −Solo founder — bus factor risk
- −No unique features vs competitors
- −Generic security claims
- −Discord/WhatsApp only 'coming soon'
ShipClaw Verdict
Best if you want AI credits included and don't want to bring your own API keys. Limited to Telegram for now.
SimpleClaw Verdict
Free tier and multi-model choice (Claude, GPT, Gemini). Still a straightforward option for users who value simplicity. Telegram-only for now.